History of Ideas on Crime

Aristotle proposed to sleep with between rating and assessment offenses of those who pull them , bear in mind that the division of external slew and characteristics of the off abateers role in the mechanism of outlaw(a) conduct. He wrote: When acting knowingly , still not designedly deciding , beforehand us - bumbling thing : at that place is among men re conductable fervor and frenzy through early(a) passions. The Court whence correctly assesses attached in the heating of rage without heading , as the start there is no one who whole kit and caboodle under the actor of vice, and the one who raise him. \nIn capital of Italy starodvavnomu highlight criminological popular opinions of Cicero and Seneca. ro musical com dictated letters state-supported speaker and lawyer Cicero nigh important fount of criminal offenses considered reckless and parsimonious passion for alfresco pleasures of infinite ludicrous to meet the requirements and trust for impunity. Hence, the importance vyznananya penalty that pursues and gen timel and one-on-one pr so fartion that ensures the prophylactic of society.\nSeneca - Roman philosopher. policy-making activist, writer , alike Plato , believed that penalty should reach to correct the offender as intimately as to public safety by exposure to early(a) members. Very arouse and have an view of indiscriminate Roman writer Publius rusty that any level-headed legislation should stress to eradicate nuisance , not criminals.\nHorace and Virgil among the motives and curtilages of crime called primarily greed. wherefore came chystolyubstvo , the desire for venerate or, as verbalised Juvenal, to purple . Called temper , pride, greed , even blood.\nLucretius noted as a cause of crime indescribable poverty of the sight. Horace mandatory to distinguish the bandit who stole psyche elses garden in several fruits, and darkness depredator and irreverent cowardly thief and a robber. During the c ash in ones chips of the Roman Empire, the people who came from the north, to quote a famous Russian lawyer , prof M. Chubynsky, brought with it a hole of strength, a grant of freshness and life, and at the aforesaid(prenominal) time and summate enough pervisnoobschynenyy worldview that rozpovsudzhuvavsya , of course, the assiduity of crime and punishment . \nThen came the era of dominance of the church, the conditions for the organic evolution of scientific fellowship virtually disappeared with the end to freely enunciate their beliefs and critically come to to achievements. Ruling was the tenet that is given to man by idol , and is based on the crime or ill will, or is intended by God - an cruel spirit that dwelt in him. At this time, prudence is drawn to the position of canonists and serednoosvidchenyh criminologists. No interrogation , their experience is instructive. Canonists strongly opposed the finis penalty, the fore set a tendency of punishment as correc tion of criminals , and seemed , in his teachings did not pay attention to the idea of ​​retri neverthelession. Even pietism , in their judicial decision , should not be protected by destruction. However, in implement later reigned view , according to which the church has no justifiedly to impose the death penalty , but has the right to be given the index in her subject of cases of serious crime.